$73 Million Cleanup Targets Contaminated Ocean Floor
By Cat Lazaroff
TORRANCE, California, December 20, 2000 (ENS) - Four companies will pay $73 million to clean up contamination from the pesticide DDT and restore the ocean environment off the coast of Los Angeles. The settlement with the United States and State of California, filed Tuesday, ends a 10 year suit over the world's largest DDT pollution site.
The agreement settles a lawsuit brought by the Justice Department and the California Attorney General against Montrose Chemical Corporation of California, Aventis CropScience USA Inc., Chris-Craft Industries Inc., and Atkemix Thirty Seven Inc., companies that either owned or operated a DDT manufacturing plant in Los Angeles County.
"This agreement brings an end to years of acrimonious litigation," said Lois Schiffer, assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's environment and natural resources division. "It gives a critical boost for cleaning up contamination and restoring the natural resources that are essential to the health of California's coastal environment."
The U.S. Justice Department and the California Attorney General filed suit in 1990 under the federal Superfund law, alleging that the companies were responsible for releasing DDT and other hazardous substances into the environment. The lawsuit charged that the DDT injured natural resources, including fish and birds that live in and around coastal waters.
From 1947 until 1971, the Montrose plant discharged an estimated 1,800 tons of DDT into Los Angeles County sewers that empty into the Pacific Ocean. Montrose also dumped hundreds of tons of DDT contaminated waste into the ocean near Santa Catalina Island.
The discharge of DDT through the sewer system created the largest known area of DDT contamination in the world. More than 110 tons of DDT remains in a 17 square mile layer of contaminated sediment on the Palos Verdes shelf, an area of the ocean floor off the coast of Los Angeles.
The pesticide DDT, or dichloro-diphenyl trichloroethane, has been banned in the U.S. since 1972. DDT remains in the environment for years after use and concentrates in the tissues of fish and birds.
Species at the top of the food chain receive the highest doses and can suffer reproductive problems. DDT causes thinning of the eggshells of birds including bald eagles, brown pelicans and peregrine falcons, and as a result, the eggs may fail to hatch.
Montrose, at one time the world's largest manufacturer of DDT, was owned and operated by the Stauffer Chemical Company, the predecessor company to Aventis CropScience USA Inc., and by Chris-Craft Industries Inc. and its predecessors. Atkemis Thirty-Seven currently owns the property where the now defunct DDT plant is located.
The U.S. and California previously reached similar settlements with County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles, which operated the sewers that conveyed the DDT to the ocean, about 150 municipalities that discharged other substances through the sewers, and three other corporate defendants - Potlach, Simpson and CBS/Westinghouse - that discharged PCBs through the sewers and into the ocean.
The restoration funds will be used by federal and state natural resource trustees - including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the State Lands Commission, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the California Department of Parks and Recreation - on projects such as artificial reefs to provide new habitat for fish and a program to reintroduce bald eagles and peregrine falcons to Santa Catalina and the other Channel Islands.
"The precedent setting natural resources damage settlement, combined with the EPA's cleanup efforts, will enable the Fish and Wildlife Service and other natural resource trustees to restore bald eagles, peregrine falcons and sea birds to the Channel Islands, where they were common until their populations were decimated by DDT in the 1940s and 1950s," said Mike Spear, manager of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's California-Nevada operations office.
"Thanks to the settlement, we now have the funding necessary to tackle head on the DDT problem off the coast of Palos Verdes. For too long, this toxic pesticide has endangered the important habitat for everything from bald eagles to white croaker," said Keith Takata, director of the U.S. EPA's Superfund program in San Francisco. "This deal is good news for all who care about human health and our natural resources."
The EPA will continue an ongoing investigation into the feasibility and effectiveness of capping the contaminated sediment by burying it where it is, using clean, natural sediment as the capping material. The State of California will be involved in the remediation plan that is ultimately selected.
The EPA plans to address human health risks from exposure to DDT contaminated fish from the site by working with local officials to improve enforcement of commercial fishing restrictions and increase awareness of recreational consumption advisories. The agency also plans to work with local community based groups, markets and fishermen to develop monitoring programs that will focus on consumer awareness and cultural sensitivity.
Tuesday's proposed settlement will be published in the Federal Register. Any person may submit written comments during a 30 day comment period to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530.
For more information about the contaminated area and the progress of cleanup, visit the EPA's website at http://www.epa.gov/region09/features/pvshelf/